Selznick Releasing Organization, 86m 27s
"There's
something different about that child."
—Eben
Adams
At
times my random movie selections yield unexpected parallels and pronounced
contrasts. The day prior to viewing PORTRAIT
OF JENNIE my choice was SOUL
(2020), the latest creation from Pixar Animation Studios. The Pixar film
presents a jazz pianist in search of his big break, that special performance
that catapults a musician into the public consciousness for good. By way of an
incredible adventure, he learns a person's life should not be defined by a
narrow pursuit. Life is about living each moment for all it is worth, savoring
all of the little day-to-day things our wonderful world has to offer. In its
story about a struggling artist in search of the recognition that has eluded
him, the hybrid romantic fantasy / film
noir PORTRAIT OF JENNIE makes
precisely the opposite point.
At
The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City hangs a painting entitled
"Portrait of Jennie," completed in 1934 by local artist Eben Adams
(Joseph Cotten). After the introductory segment attests to the importance of
what we are about to see, we meet the as of yet unsuccessful artist Eben in the
winter months of 1932. With an affectless voice, he presents some of his
landscape paintings to Matthews (Cecil Kellaway) and Miss Spinney (the always
credible Ethel Barrymore). Matthews registers no interest in Eben or his work,
but Spinney sees something in him and makes a purchase against the better
judgment of Matthews. Eben then encounters an oddly enchanting teenage girl in
Central Park named Jennie Appleton (Jennifer Jones). After some mysterious
dialogue, she vanishes. Taken with the girl, Eben pulls an all-nighter to
sketch her to the best of his memory. He later discovers a newspaper that was
in Jennie's possession was printed in 1910.
NY through a canvas |
Thanks
to the encouragement of his buddy Gus O'Toole (David Wayne), Eben lands a job
painting a bar mural of Michael Collins for pub proprietor Moore (Albert
Sharpe), but all of Eben's thoughts are with the enigmatic girl Jennie. Spinney
buys his sketch of her, which seems to confirm Eben's promise as a serious
artist. He honors his contract with Moore, but shows no pride in unveiling his
finished project as the artist makes a quiet exit from the noisy pub. A far
more important assignment awaits with his ethereal vision Jennie, who fires-up
Eben to believe his portrait of her will bring him an international audience.
If Eben's early paintings lacked passion, there is nothing emotionally hollow
about his devotion to Jennie and his rendition of her likeness.
As
is too often the case in Hollywood cinema of all eras, the age difference
between the two leads is rather off-putting (about 14 years, complicated by the
fact Cotten looked a bit older than he was and Jones looked younger). More
troublesome is Eben's fascination with Jennie as a child; at least Jennie does not enter Eben's apartment until she is
able to announce her status as college freshman. By the time she graduates, Eben
wishes to marry his muse. Eben's feelings for Jennie are buoyed by his friendly
relationship with the older Miss Spinney, which suggests a certain timelessness
about human affection.
The inspiration of a lifetime emerges from darkness |
Based
upon the 1940 novella of the same title by Robert Nathan, PORTRAIT OF JENNIE is a product of The Selznick Studio, with plenty
of flourishes that announce the fact. William Dieterle was an inspired choice
to direct for Selznick. The director of THE
DEVIL AND DANIEL WEBSTER (1941), Dieterle shows great awareness of depth in
his compositions; often the viewer's eye is compelled to review information in
the foreground, middleground and background. Dimitri Tiomkin's musical score,
based upon themes of Claude Debussy, sometimes becomes overly intrusive,
especially when it needlessly alerts the viewer we are in the presence of the
fantastic. Ultimately the production's budget would tailspin out of control due
to a revolving door of writers (Leonardo Bercovici, Paul Osborn, Peter Berneis,
Ben Hecht), an extended shooting schedule, the addition of a Magnascope process
with green tint for the lighthouse sequence and the high costs associated with
extensive location work. The result was a box office failure that had a
chilling effect on Selznick's career as a producer. Nonetheless PORTRAIT OF JENNIE would win the
Academy Award for Best Effects, Special Effects. Cinematographer Joseph H.
August, who died shortly after the production's completion, received a
posthumous nomination for Best Cinematography, Black-and-White. His occasional
shots through a painter's canvas memorably add to the film's dramatic momentum.
The perfect balance: foreground/background composition |
Though
doubtless intended a romantic fantasy first, the filmmakers tap into a noir palette for their overarching theme
of irreversible tragedy. The noir
film often insists current events are dominated by something significant that
happened in the past. That notion is embedded in the very titles of some of the
genre's well-known classics, i.e. OUT OF
THE PAST (1947), THE DARK PAST
(1948) and TOO LATE FOR TEARS
(1949). With the spectral character of its title, PORTRAIT OF JENNIE shares a connection to those films, and even
reaches beyond them in the way it conflates the past with the present. When
Eben first meets Jennie, she talks about the past as if it were the present. We discover she has no choice, she is a tragic noir character forever trapped in a time
passed.
The film noir sensibility of PORTRAIT OF JENNIE is immersed in water, which factors in the death of Jennie, who interestingly reappears surrounded by snow and ice. In his "notes on film noir" (FILM COMMENT, Vol. 8, No. 1 [SPRING 1972], pp. 8-13), Paul Schrader observed:
"There
seems to be an almost Freudian attachment to water. The empty noir streets are
almost always glistening with fresh evening rain (even in Los Angeles), and the
rainfall tends to increase in direct proportion to the drama. Docks and piers
are second only to alleyways as the most popular rendezvous points."
The
water motif that trickles through the film is absorbed in two other crucial noir themes: obsession and fate. Eben's pursuit of Jennie
is a story of hopeless obsession, a search in vain for an unattainable woman.
Mother Mary of Mercy (Lillian Gish) reveals the impossibility of Eben's desire
to be with Jennie, last seen near Land's End in Cape Cod some 10 years ago. The
fate element is underscored when Matthews' dog makes a beeline for Eben.
Matthews explains his dog gravitates to strangers who are in some sort of
danger zone. An animal's instinct proves sound when fate leads Eben to a
climactic sequence in New England that seems to mark him for death, in many
ways the most logical conclusion for the narrative. Indeed it would be more
appropriate for Eben to lose his battle with the raging storm that seems
brought about by Jennie herself. Eben's existential determination is curious;
not only what looks to be certain oceanic death deters him from a woman who no
longer exists. From a casting standpoint, noir
credibility is well established with the sturdy presence of Joseph Cotten, who
appeared in CITIZEN KANE (1941) and SHADOW OF A DOUBT (1943), films that
would influence the noir form
considerably. He also appeared in WALK
SOFTLY, STRANGER (1950), an underrated noir
gem that deserves critical reassessment (did film critic Bosley Crowther ever
get it right?).
Rainfall follows Jennie's departure |
The
dual-layered Blu-ray edition available from Kino Lorber Studio Classics is
framed at 1.33:1, in disagreement with the original theatrical aspect ratio of
1.37:1 (according to IMDb.com). Though generally acceptable, the source
material reveals a fair amount of scratches and various artifacts. The audio
commentary track is courtesy of film historian Troy Howarth, perhaps the most
affable voice working today. As always, he shows both deep knowledge and
passion for the film under review. His standout observation is the inherently
humanistic quality of PORTRAIT OF JENNIE;
all of the film's characters are basically good people. With the occasional
exception, such food has been eliminated from Hollywood's modern menu. Indeed
there are some "creepy undercurrents" to the romance as Howarth puts
it, but I agree the filmmakers make no attempt to nudge the viewer's thoughts
in that direction. The driving force behind the film was producer David O.
Selznick, whose production goal was a lasting tribute to the love of his life.
Those who subscribe to the auteur theory tend to point to directors
exclusively, though Howarth considers Selznick one of those rare producers who
might be considered in such terms.
Howarth
dives deeply into the background information of all of the major contributors,
and even offers good details about some of the bit players. Howarth cites
Berkeley Square, a play by John L. Balderston that premiered in 1926, as a work
that likely influenced PORTRAIT OF
JENNIE. The portrait around which the plot revolves was painted by artist
Robert Brackman, who required multiple attempts to produce a product in harmony
with Selznick's conception.
The
disc also includes a trailer gallery.
The noir staircase |
Finished portrait of Jennie, unveiled in three-strip Technicolor |
This film reminds me of JM Barrie's Mary Rose which Alfred Hitchcock had a passion to film after he saw it at a London theatre in 1920. Yet no studio would give him the green light. Some of its influence can be seen in Vertigo. I wonder what he thought of Portrait of Jennie? He was drawn to the theme of hopeless love.
ReplyDeleteMy thanks to Eric Somer for much new information on the film, one of my favorites for decades. Imagine my delight spotting a paperback copy of Robert Nathan's novel, "Portrait of Jennie," in a shabby Dickensian bookshop on Flatbush Ave., Brooklyn, mid-1980s. I still have it, and treasure it. (Also have a DVD of Selznick's film version, now out of print, alas.) A memorable story & a fine cinematic adaption. M. Mulvihill, NY.
ReplyDelete____
The story is wonderful, etherial, and most importantly - unpredictable. The film treatment ruins the story, absolutely ruins it. Nothing is left to the viewer, everything is spelled out; that's a death knell for a story like this. A bad script, it just doesn't work. Typical American simple-minded, childish pap. (See Adams and Westons - the Masters!)
ReplyDeleteI'm reminded of Mel Brooks in High Anxiety - with a web-like shadow on his face - crying out: "I feel like I'm caught in a web!" That's how shallow this film is. A waste of good actors.
Imagine how wonderful this story would be if Renoir had directed it.