Sunday, August 28, 2022

SMOOTH AS SILK (1946) and SO DARK THE NIGHT (1946)


SMOOTH AS SILK (1946)
Universal Pictures, 64m
Format: 35mm
6:45 PM, Saturday, August 27th, 2022

SO DARK THE NIGHT (1946)
Columbia Pictures, 71m
Format: 35mm
8:30 PM, Saturday, August 27th, 2022
 
NOIR CITY: CHICAGO 2022
Music Box Theatre, Chicago, IL
Friday, August 26th, 2022 to Thursday, September 1st, 2022
NOIR CITY: CHICAGO 2022 SCHEDULE

Yesterday's NOIR CITY lineup was presented by Turner Classic Movies' Noir Alley host Eddie Muller, who was onsite with a selection of B titles for the day. I attended two of them, each connected to the other by willful women whose actions lead to dire consequences for the significant men in their lives. SMOOTH AS SILK stars Virginia Grey, one of the film industry's great "almost" stories according to Muller. Born in Hollywood, she grew up in the business and never broke through, though she did enjoy a long career as an actress (into the 1970s). She makes quite an impression in this starring role as an energetically egocentric femme fatale.

The taut B noir opens with the conclusion of a court case. Thanks to attorney Mark Fenton (Kent Taylor), well-known drinker and player Don Elliott (Danny Morton) has eluded a manslaughter charge. Don's uncle and trustee Stephen Elliott (John Litel) happens to be a stage producer, and Mark hopes to leverage the situation since his actress fiancée Paula Marlowe (Grey) would like to play the lead in Stephen's next production. Stephen expresses no interest in casting Paula, who winds up with a bracelet from Mark instead of what she really wants. The type of woman Paula is gets definition via a closeup when she learns the drunkard Don stands to inherit $3 million. Paula gets to know Don only to shift her charms to Stephen and his new play "Miracle at Midnight." As Paula goes from man to man in her efforts to further her career as an actress, Mark is left to brood. At that time SMOOTH AS SILK firmly puts a large footprint down in noir terrain, with Mark and his private investigator enveloped by the shadows of venetian blinds, that telltale noir signature for criminal minds at work.

An obvious instance of one of the genre's scheming spider women, all of Paula's thoughts revolve around herself. After one of the men in her life is found shot dead, her immediate concern is she could be accused of the crime. And thanks in good part to the mind work of this beautiful but conniving dame, a once respectable lawman is converted into a murderer, one who arranges evidence as to point the finger at another suspect. Not only that, the same guy labors to convince Don he is the real killer (a fair plan since Don could not recall what happened when a vehicle he was driving terminated the life of a pedestrian). Don is a figure persistently impacted by the noir atmosphere of randomness and instability. Though not the most upstanding member of the community, Don is not the man he is encouraged to believe he is. He is also horribly confused about the nature of Paula, who is exactly like the lead character in his uncle's play, not the polar opposite he imagines her to be. Therefor it might be assumed she is not necessarily much of an actress either; once awarded the role she is merely playing herself. Ironically the Elliott's butler Wolcott (Harry Cheshire) understands Paula best.

A remake of A NOTORIOUS GENTLEMAN (1935), SMOOTH AS SILK was directed by Charles Barton, a filmmaker who eventually edged into television, as so many directors did. Cinematography was handled by Elwood Bredell. The screenplay was completed by the combination of Dane Lussier and Kerry Shaw, who adapted the original story credited to Florence Ryerson and Colin Clements. Though an enjoyable little diversion from beginning to end, at a runtime of just over an hour there is a sense that SMOOTH AS SILK comes together a little too quickly in its concluding segments. Another area of weakness is the character Susan Marlowe (Jane Adams), Paula's good-and-decent little sister, is introduced to fall for John Kimble (Milburn Stone), though that plot thread goes unresolved.

Next on the docket was SO DARK THE NIGHT, helmed by director Joseph H. Lewis, a completely self-taught filmmaker who nudged his way into Hollywood based on the career of his older brother Ben Lewis, an established film editor. Joseph proved himself an instinctive storyteller and artist with his B films of the 1940s. His ability to do distinctive work on a limited budget distinguished him from his contemporaries. SO DARK THE NIGHT is an example of filmmaking on a shoestring budget, with locations within five miles of the Columbia lot standing in for the French countryside. Festival host Eddie Muller cited this film as one of the genre's unreliable narratives.

Parisian detective Henri Cassin (frequent bit player Steven Geray in a rare leading role) attempts to take some time off only to find himself engulfed in a murder case. Cassin rents a room at a remote inn, where he attracts the attention of Nanette Michaud (Micheline Cheirel), the daughter of Pierre Michaud (Eugene Borden) and Mama Michaud (Ann Codee). Though Cassin is quite a bit older than Nanette (in that grand Hollywood tradition), she is drawn to his worldliness and sees him as a way out of the country and into the exciting big city lights of Paris. But to the approval of Pierre and the disappointment of Mama, Nanette already has been promised to Leon Achard (Paul Marion), a simple local man of limited financial resources.

The noir universe extends to rural French environs when a triple murder case emerges, with Cassin conveniently on hand to assist hopelessly perplexed local authorities. Both Mama and Nanette embody noir female archetypes fascinated with material things they "deserve," as well as women intent on breaking away from the patriarchal system that dictates who women should marry. Interestingly, Pierre loses both of them after he reinforces the notion that Nanette would be better off with Leon than the much older detective from Paris. A notably noir sense of fatalism takes root when the lifelong bachelor Cassin concludes, "That much happiness just wasn't meant for me." As the multiple murder investigation progresses, the film veers off into a psychological direction in its examination of an accomplished crime investigator on holiday. Suffice is to say his suspicions about his destiny prove prescient.

Director Lewis later would score with the undisputed film noir classics GUN CRAZY (1950) and THE BIG COMBO (1955), though I also think a lot of MY NAME IS JULIA ROSS (1945), an intense B noir released the year prior to SO DARK THE NIGHT. The film under review here constitutes a lesser achievement than those titles, though is interesting in its implication that to be married to one's profession is inherently unhealthy and is sure to catch up with you. But at the end of the day, there are too many implausibilities and Steven Geray just is not an appealing lead. Martin Berkeley and Dwight V. Babcock wrote the screenplay, based on a story by Aubrey Wisberg. Director of photography Burnett Guffey probably contributed to the film noir movement as much as anyone, including B movies such as MY NAME IS JULIA ROSS, NIGHT EDITOR (1946) and NIGHTFALL (1956) as well as crucial genre classics like ALL THE KING'S MEN (1949), IN A LONELY PLACE (1950) and THE SNIPER (1952).

Sunday, July 31, 2022

DEPORTED (1950)

Universal Pictures, 88m 52s

Another of film noir's evocative one-word title treatments, DEPORTED unveils the inverse of the American dream, one immigrant's remarkable full-circle journey. The standard narrative that features the determined immigrant is given a noir flash forward in this international production with distinctly American concerns. Though many of its implications are cynical, DEPORTED is not without a glimmer of hope.

The material was inspired by the deportation of real-life crime boss Charles "Lucky" Luciano (born Salvatore Lucania). Our story opens in Naples, Italy where Vic Smith (Jeff Chandler) is being returned from American soil after an extended stay in New York City. Vic first immigrated to the US in the early 1920s but has been booted from the country after serving a five-year stretch in Sing Sing for racketeering. At the pier to welcome Vic is Vito Bucelli (Claude Dauphin) of the Italian Ministry of the Interior, who strongly believes Vic will be intent on recovering the $100K in ill-gotten gains he has hidden somewhere. Bucelli is an intuitive man (think Barton Keyes [Edward G. Robinson] from DOUBLE INDEMNITY [1944]). Determined to catch a criminal before he commits a crime, Bucelli has a nose for such matters, a nose that has been reliable for many, many years. Per a mandate from Bucelli, Vic must stay with his remaining family for 30 days minimum in Marbella.


A self-assertive, confident man, Vic shows how quickly he can get the upper hand in a tough situation during an unexpected meeting with his former partner in crime Bernardo "Bernie" Gervaso (Richard Rober, burdened with some of the film's exposition dialog). Bernie has followed Vic to Italy in the hope of getting his share of the money Vic has stashed, though Vic feels entitled to the entire $100K since he did five years and kept his mouth shut about their partnership. Prepared for a requisite low-key existence in Marbella, Vic's outlook improves when he eyes Countess Christine di Lorenzi (Märta Torén), an elegant, philanthropic brunette and widow of five years (interestingly, the same amount of time Vic spent in a correctional facility). During that time frame Christine has lived in sexual retirement, perhaps another parallel to Vic. It is not difficult to understand why Vic falls for Christine; that a woman of her social experience would desire him tends to strain credulity.

DEPORTED is set in a post-WWII land of food shortages, with bread lines a frustrating part of daily life. That circumstance underscores a major difference in character types when Christine is upset to notice Vic encourage children to fight over an item of value (an old habit of his introduced in the film's early moments). Here we have "roughneck" American capitalist notions defiantly at odds with the European socialist, along with the existing contrast between the uneducated, boorish male criminal and the sensitive, cultured woman with a charitable heart. Christine, who would like nothing more than to know everyone has enough to eat, wrongly equates Vic with selfless American goodness and generosity when in truth he embodies corrosive American greed.



Gina Carapia (Marina Berti) serves as femme fatale and counterpoint to Christine. Though Gina leads Vic into a tough setting when they first meet, when he later encounters her, he cannot resist following her again. That is the dangerous film noir woman for certain; even when a man knows of her essence, he cannot deny his attraction to her. In her own way Gina is more worldly than the aristocrat Christine. From the very beginning Gina understands Vic far better than her polar opposite does. "Oh, I could fool you a hundred times," Gina assures Vic. In fact, it is only due to Gina's command of her magnetic sexuality that Bernie is able to link Vic to Guido Caruso (Carlo Rizzo), a local small-timer noted for moving food for badly inflated prices through the black market.

Probably the most noir element of DEPORTED is the association it draws between Vic's dark past and America's relationship with other countries. The US likes to think of itself as the world hero who props up other countries unable to do as much on their own. Perhaps the truth is there is no such thing as a completely benevolent benefactor, that behind every ostensibly humane act is a person like Vic, driven primarily by his own interests. "Mr. America" he derisively calls himself at one point. Vic's antithesis is his salt-of-the-earth uncle Armando Sparducci (Silvio Minciotti), an altruistic bread baker content to live a simple life devoid of material possessions. Uncle Armando mistakenly believes his nephew worked for the US government based upon a federal notice he received! It is inferred large amounts of such gullibility is necessary for deception to function on a grand scale.



To connect additional noir themes and motifs with Vic is simple, such as the familiar noir trope of multiple identities within one body (Vic Smith / Vittorio Mario Sparducci), a pattern set in place to convey complexity of personality. Then there is the unmistakable noir theme of alienation experienced by the lead protagonist. Vic no longer can be part of the criminal underground, nor should he expect to find acceptance in the legitimate business world. Though obviously a flawed individual with a shady history, like so many film noir protagonists he does reveal a moral compass. Ultimately, he comes clean with both Christine and his uncle about who he really is and what he has done. The ironic atmosphere often crucial to the film noir manifests itself in terms of Vic's $100K that eludes his grasp. When the money is as close to him in Marbella as it is going to get, he finds himself in a painfully awkward position:  to acknowledge any sense of his humanity would destroy him. Even more ironic, it turns out only the poor benefit from the $100K that Vic hoped would enrich his life exclusively.

Director Robert Siodmak was one of film noir's most frequent and consistent contributors. His optimal work in the genre includes PHANTOM LADY (1944), THE KILLERS (1946) and CRISS CROSS (1949). I would not put DEPORTED in Siodmak's upper tier, but I found it to be a sturdy motion picture that withstands repeat viewings without issue. The screenplay was by writer/producer Robert Buckner, who adapted the story PARADISE LOST '49 by Canadian novelist Lionel Shapiro. Incredibly prolific cinematographer William H. Daniels also handled the camera for a respectable film noir lineup that includes BRUTE FORCE (1947), THE NAKED CITY (1948), ABANDONED (1949) and WOMAN IN HIDING (1950). DEPORTED was shot on location in Italy, and the influence of Italian neorealism is apparent. From a cinematography standpoint, the first noirish sequence occurs roughly a half hour into the film, when Vic and Christine have coffee on her terrace. The concluding sequence plays out in undeniable noir fashion:  a tense confrontation in a claustrophobic warehouse, well handled by Daniels. Jeff Chandler is credible enough in the lead role, though I could not watch without thinking about how ideal this role would have been for Humphrey Bogart. Actually, the other actors considered for the lead were Dana Andrews, Victor Mature and John Garfield. Sadly, both Jeff Chandler and Märta Torén would die young:  Chandler at 42 and Torén at 30.





This single-layered Blu-ray edition from Kino Lorber, released late last year, as far as I know marks the domestic debut of this title on home video. Framed at the original theatrical scope of 1.37:1, the transfer impresses for the most part while the occasional speckles, scratches and other artifacts that plague the opening credits calm down considerably as the film unspools. Film historian Eddy Von Mueller recorded a fresh audio commentary for this "runaway production" (a film shot primarily outside of the Hollywood area). Shooting required three weeks in Italy, two weeks on the studio lot and a $170K budget. Von Mueller makes a lot of good observations about Vic, a two-time alien:  first as an Italian immigrant in the US, then as a deportee. DEPORTED is not a film noir in Von Mueller's estimation, which is easy enough to debate. At minimum I consider it what film scholar Alan K. Rode might label "noir stained." Where Von Mueller and I find a lot of common ground is within the safe assumption that Vic represents all the best and worst impulses of American leadership. Through our lead protagonist Vic, the production endorses the Marshall Plan, the American effort to prop up Western Europe after WWII, while it delivers something of an apology for American deficiencies. Christine mirrors the international reaction to idealistic American compulsions. She even declares her love for Vic after she comes to terms with his worst qualities. The filmmakers ask the audience to do the same when it comes to American foreign policy.

The disc includes a collection of trailers for comparable titles available from Kino Lorber.

Sunday, June 26, 2022

REPEAT PERFORMANCE (1947)

Eagle-Lion Films, 93m 18s

 "They say that fate is in the stars, that each of our years is planned ahead, and nothing can change destiny. Is that true?"
—voiceover by John Ireland

 

Most every proper film noir is enmeshed deeply in fate, or as it is stated repeatedly in this Eagle-Lion Films release, "destiny." One of many effective noir exercises from Bryan Foy Productions, REPEAT PERFORMANCE conflates the crime movie and the fantasy film for a woman's melodrama in the vein of MILDRED PIERCE (1945), with a career-oriented woman confronted by a stringent noir universe.

Set in New York City on New Year's Eve, 1946, Broadway actress Sheila Page (21-year-old Joan Leslie) guns down her husband playwright Barney Page (Louis Hayward, top-billed) in their high-rise apartment. In a daze over what just transpired, Sheila seeks the comfort of her trusted friends writer William Williams (Richard Basehart, his debut) and stage producer John Friday (Tom Conway). She laments the past year's events and wishes for a do-over. While the narration anticipates the type of conditions made famous in the television series THE TWILIGHT ZONE (1959–1964), Sheila realizes to her bewilderment her wish has been granted! A dead-end 1946 is about to play out once again, for the better she hopes. Though not everything works out exactly the same as before, Sheila recognizes fairly early occurrences she wanted to avoid crop up anyway. The mysterious force of fate is at work when somewhat supercilious playwright Paula Costello (Virginia Field) rings the wrong doorbell and attends a New Year's Eve party hosted by Sheila and Barney. Although under entirely different circumstances, Barney meets Paula, as he had the first time 1946 unspooled. What has not changed is the same dagger is aimed at Sheila. Can she keep them apart this time?



Though a cross-genre film, REPEAT PERFORMANCE honors standard film noir assumptions of the mid-to-late 1940s. Unhappiness within the boundaries of marriage is a frequent film noir concern, the structural material that supports noir narratives such as DOUBLE INDEMNITY (1944), THE SUSPECT (1944), SCARLET STREET (1945), MILDRED PIERCE (1945), THE STRANGE LOVE OF MARTHA IVERS (1946) and POSSESSED (1947). Barney's hit play "Out of the Blue" made a Broadway star of his wife Sheila five years ago, but that one triumph did not make him an ascendant creative force. An undisciplined writer who has waddled into alcoholism, Barney has failed to follow-up with anything as impactful as the play that catapulted his wife to stardom. Hardly a sympathetic figure, the resentful, frequently embarrassing drunkard Barney is the story's homme fatale and ultimately the sort of noir psychopath memorialized by Richard Widmark in KISS OF DEATH (1947). Particularly when drinking Barney is an impossible personality to confront. And just get a load of the level of misogyny directed from Barney to his wife:  "...you're only a woman. You're not expected to have either judgement or intelligence." He also lies to Sheila about his feelings for Paula and her attraction to him.

A filmmaking cliche I always seem to respond to is that for one person to rise another inevitably must fall (that setup is an especially intriguing dynamic in a modern society based upon crony capitalism). The narrative's sense of urgency really accelerates when Barney's professional fall becomes literal. After Barney totters off a theater balcony, the accident converts Barney into an invalid, thrust into the great tradition of hobbled noir males that depend upon crutches (DOUBLE INDEMNITY [1944]), canes (GILDA [1946]) or even dual walking canes (THE LADY FROM SHANGHAI [1947]) for mobility. The case of Barney especially recalls Richard Mason (Humphrey Bogart) from CONFLICT (1945), a man who actually could walk but sat in a wheelchair in front of his wife for selfish reasons.



Female archetypes are consistently of interest in the film noir, and REPEAT PERFORMANCE offers an assortment of females worthy of our attention. The story revolves around Sheila, who at one juncture looks into the camera as she defends her worthless husband, as if pleading with viewers directly for understanding of her failing relationship. The filmmakers are on her side from beginning to end as she clings to whatever good is left in Barney. Other female characters are decidedly less endearing. Actress Bess Michaels (Benay Venuta) is a boozing busybody, and Eloise Shaw (Natalie Schafer), who backs the careers of young male artists who excite her, literally turns the spotlight on Barney and Paula locked together for a stunned Sheila to witness in front of her peers. Eloise also commits William to an insane asylum, presumably because she found out he was gay and thus uninterested in fulfilling her sexual desires. But the featured femme fatale is the playwright Paula, who barely reacts to being slapped by Sheila (who subsequently takes an open hand to her face from her frustrated husband, now turned physically abusive). Interestingly we are granted a hint of Barney's inability to contain Paula when he is unable to light her cigarette. Sure enough, later we learn Paula's attraction to Barney has faded after she has learned he might never fully recover from his fall. His pathetic attempt to follow the spider woman to London results in his descent into madness; at this point he is the certifiable psycho, not William. As Barney leaves the ship for a confrontation with his wife, the scene both rhymes and contrasts with Sheila's gaze into the camera in that earlier sequence. Now it is Barney who seems to be looking right at us, though obviously without any of the hopefulness conveyed by Sheila. The bandages that remain on his forehead speak to his disturbed mental state and dangerous frame of mind, a casualty of an unforgiving noir world he believes pushed him aside.

The film noir's attachment to rainfall is a trope probably even the occasional noir watcher recognizes. For those who like to take note of symbolism, it rains the evening Barney and Paula first share an embrace. Rainfall is emphasized again when Sheila visits Barney at the hospital three weeks post-fall. And later at the sanitarium rain links William, the poet being evaluated by psychiatrists, to Barney, the man with the bandaged head determined to kill his wife. The elements seem to provide the connective tissue in both versions of 1946, beginning with the clouds and stormy weather that accompany the opening credits and introductory sequence.

In the final analysis, the hand of fate discussed in the film's opening narration offers no second chance for a doomed marriage. Though certain events of Sheila's repeat of 1946 unfold differently, neither year spares her husband Barney, a man undeserving of additional opportunities. Some people cannot be helped, no matter how hard their loved ones try. Sometimes love and devotion results only in recurring disappointments. Rather surprisingly, neither Paula nor Sheila is punished for transgressions almost always dealt with definitively during the Production Code era.


Director Alfred L. Werker also helmed SHOCK (1946), a fine film noir of its time with Vincent Price in the lead. He also co-directed the Richard Basehart vehicle HE WALKED BY NIGHT (1948) with Anthony Mann. Cinematographer L. William O'Connell shot the gangster film classic SCARFACE (1932) and also DECOY (1946), one of the wildest of B-noirs. Though the intermingling of the noir film and the fantasy film was not common, there are some other instances of merit, including FLESH AND FANTASY (1943), PORTRAIT OF JENNIE (1948), NIGHT HAS A THOUSAND EYES (1948) and ALIAS NICK BEAL (1949). The holiday favorite IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE (1946) also must be mentioned as an influence; recall the noirish Pottersville that bared so little resemblance to Bedford Falls.

The new Flicker Alley dual-format edition Blu-ray / DVD set (ALL REGION) presents the feature film framed at 1.37:1 and save for a random scratch looks about as good in motion as one could imagine. In fact, this is an incredible restoration of a film noir I likely never would have seen had it not been for the efforts of The Film Noir Foundation to preserve it, and other important works like it, for future generations of movie fans. Supplemental material includes an audio commentary track anchored by film historian Nora Fiore, AKA “The Nitrate Diva,” who credits REPEAT PERFORMANCE as the first big production from Eagle-Lion Films. Though estimates vary depending on the source, producer Aubrey Schenck recalled a roughly $600K budget. Fiore mentions the original source material was focused on Barney, not Sheila, who was a villainess. That arrangement would not have been an ideal match for Joan Leslie, thus the adaptation reversed things. Critical consensus at the time was uncharitable. Fiore's most astute observation is that Sheila is at her most confident when focused on her career; in her private life she wields far less leverage. She also points out William is sacrificed in the interest of his straight friend Sheila's preservation, although the film does conclude with a personal proverb from the defeated man William.

A brief introduction (5m 27s) to REPEAT PERFORMANCE comes by way of film noir historian and frequent NOIR CITY film festival host Eddie Muller, who credits Flicker Alley, UCLA Film & Television Archive and the Packard Humanities Institute for their work with The Film Noir Foundation to make this restoration a reality. This much-appreciated Blu-ray release arrives roughly 15 years after Muller first presented the film for public viewing. That print, from a private collection, was in desperate need of restoration. The finished product looks fantastic and should be snapped up by noir devotees while it is readily available.

Next up is a profile (9m 22s) of actress Joan Leslie by author and film historian Farran Smith Nehme. While under contract at Warner Bros., Leslie was noted for her portrayal of ingénues in well-known Warner titles such as HIGH SIERRA (1941), SERGEANT YORK (1941) and YANKEE DOODLE DANDY (1942). Eventually she reached the conclusion her luck had run out at Warner, where she found herself appearing in titles she deemed beneath her, i.e. TOO YOUNG TO KNOW (1945), CINDERELLA JONES (1946) and JANIE GETS MARRIED (1946). After she sued Warner to get out of her contact that was signed by her parents when she was still a minor, she was blackballed by the other major studios. Leslie made her debut at Eagle-Lion Films with REPEAT PERFORMANCE, in which she replaced Constance Dowling in the lead role.

"Eagle-Lion: A Noir-Stained Legacy" (34m 25s) is a documentary by Steven C. Smith, narrated by author and film historian Alan K. Rode, who possesses an encyclopedic knowledge of noir. The British-American film production company was owned by J. Arthur Rank, with attorney Arthur B. Krim and skilled businessman Robert Benjamin in charge of the American division. With the acquisition of Robert R. Young's PRC Pictures in 1947, the idea was to create some "cross-Atlantic synergy" as Rode puts it. Their ambitions were daring since it was very difficult for anyone but the "Big Five" (Warner Bros., Paramount, 20th Century Fox, MGM and RKO) to secure significant theatrical screens. Their timing was unfortunate; box office revenues had cratered in 1946. Another challenge was so much of the major talent was contractually bound to the major studios. REPEAT PERFORMANCE would become Eagle-Lion's first prestige picture. Krim converted Eagle-Lion into a filmmaking playground for independent producers like Edward Small and Walter Wanger, with the small studio attached for a piece of the action. Without beloved movie stars, major distribution channels or the capital necessary to create a large number of prints, that approach was to be the template for profitability, along with a focus on gritty crime films now recognized as noir powerhouses, i.e. T-MEN (1947), RAW DEAL (1948), HOLLOW TRIUMPH (1948), HE WALKED BY NIGHT (1948), TRAPPED (1949) and PORT OF NEW YORK (1949). Despite many quality titles and the emergence of ace cinematographer John Alton and contributions from director Anthony Mann, profits were limited and Eagle-Lion was unable to grow. Though Eagle-Lion Films only existed for five years, Benjamin and Krim found greater success after they assumed control of United Artists in 1951 and took the company public in 1957.

Another welcome feature of this two-disc set is a digital edition of the film’s original 1947 promotional pressbook. Also bundled in the packaging is a glossy souvenir booklet that includes Brian Light’s book-to-film comparison of the 1942 William O’Farrell novel with screenwriter Walter Bullock’s adaptation, as well as original photos, lobby cards and posters. The cover art is reversible.

REPEAT PERFORMANCE was remade in 1989 as the TV movie TURN BACK THE CLOCK with Joan Leslie on board in a cameo role.


Tuesday, May 31, 2022

TOUCH OF EVIL (1958)

Universal Pictures
Preview Version: 108m 54s
Theatrical Version:  95m 19s
Reconstructed Version:  110m 35s

 


A film that has been lavished with praise, TOUCH OF EVIL is an unquestioned classic and "film noir's epitaph" according to Paul Schrader in his seminal essay "notes on film noir" (FILM COMMENT, Vol. 8, No. 1 [SPRING 1972], pp. 8-13). Directed and written for the screen by the great Orson Welles, TOUCH OF EVIL was based loosely on the 1956 novel BADGE OF EVIL by Whit Masterson (a pseudonym used by the authors Robert Allison “Bob” Wade and H. Bill Miller). The source material is quite a page-turner and arguably superior to the famous film noir it inspired, more richly detailed and comprehensive than the adaptation possibly could be, and more clear and direct in purpose. But just as easily it could be argued the unclear elements, particularly those instances open to interpretation, provide the strongest suit of the Welles interpretation. A filmmaker with a sense of style like nobody before or since, Welles exaggerates most of the boilerplate noir themes such as moral decay, corruption, the labyrinthine city, cold-blooded murder and inescapable fatalism. Familiar noir stylistic motifs like low camera angles and dark shadows cast by venetian blinds are played up to a claustrophobic degree. The result is an unforgettable noir experience, a true visual feast, regardless of which of the three versions of the film are under review.

TOUCH OF EVIL was Mr. Welles's first Hollywood effort as director in 10 years. Already attached to the film in an acting capacity, Welles was suggested to direct by the film's star Charlton Heston. In a plan to get back in the good graces of Hollywood decision-makers, Welles re-wrote the existing Paul Monash script in just a week and agreed to direct for no salary. As usual, Welles was at odds with studio officials during production, especially after principal photography had been completed and he had moved on to his next ambition. He already had a reputation for going over budget, defying studio demands and abandoning films before they had been edited to the studio's satisfaction. TOUCH OF EVIL would be the final Hollywood effort from Welles as director; he wanted a level of artistic freedom available only outside of the major American studios. Like KISS ME DEADLY (1955), TOUCH OF EVIL is a film noir that views much more like a modern movie than the genre films that preceded it, with a minimum of antiquated language that instantly dates so many noir films.

THE NOVEL:

Assistant District Attorney Mitchell Holt finds himself under political pressure to give high priority to the murder of Rudy Linneker, a prominent local industrialist killed in his home by a dynamite explosion. The death of Linneker has commanded the notice of Captain Loren McCoy and Sergeant Hank Quinlan, long-term partners with legendary status for their ability to collect evidence that leads to convictions. In the early going, McCoy and Quinlan feel confident that Linneker was murdered by his daughter Tara Linneker and her fiancé Delmont Shayon. Initially Holt accepts the solution to the crime suggested by McCoy and Quinlan, too easily for Holt's wife Consuela ("Connie"). Indeed Shayon, a shoe salesman by trade, was the perfect potential husband for Tara to disappoint her father, who doubtless would not approve. But in the course of his investigation, the savvy Holt fairly quickly comes to believe Tara and her fiancé are innocent. Holt's trusted colleague Van Dusen discovers the young couple has a perfect alibi which could not have been planned. A shoebox that contains five sticks of dynamite is found at Shayon's place, but based upon what Holt knows, he seriously questions the legitimacy of this evidence.

In a surprise turn of events, disgruntled former Linneker employee Ernest Farnum confesses to the killing of Linneker. Shayon is released, though a question remains about the contents of that shoebox. In yet another shocker that stuns Holt, Farnum changes his story and says he planted the dynamite at Shayon's residence. This radically contradicts Farnum's original feeling that he could not stomach the idea of an innocent person imprisoned for his deed. To Holt anyway, everything comes together when he learns McCoy is on record as a purchaser of dynamite! Even more damning for the police department, Holt explains to his superior James Adair that McCoy and Quinlan have a long history of discovering convenient evidence vehemently denied by the defendant. At this point Holt is convinced the famous police team planted the dynamite to frame Shayon, but Adair is not inclined to believe Holt's theory. Not only is Holt at odds with his boss, a shotgun blast takes out Holt's picture window in what appears to be a scare tactic designed to get him to back off on McCoy and Quinlan. Chief of Police Russell Gould suggests the shotgun work was staged, but additional gunfire is aimed in the direction of Holt, this time with bad intentions. Eventually Holt reaches the conclusion McCoy acted alone all these years in terms of the framings.

Holt's investigative efforts suffer another blow when Farnum hangs himself. After the death of Farnum, Holt realizes he needs a recording of McCoy admitting his guilt. If that were not sufficient pressure, Holt's wife Connie is booked for possession and use of narcotics. Consequently the press turns on Holt, his supposed political ambitions crushed for the moment. Holt suspects his handgun now rests in McCoy's hands—could another frame-up be in the works? In a desperate move, Holt convinces Quinlan to wear a wire and attempt to get the truth out of McCoy, who indeed justifies framing people based upon intuition. McCoy then shoots Quinlan with Holt's gun. Ultimately McCoy is defeated, though it requires the deaths of Rudy Linneker, Ernest Farnum and his longtime partner Hank Quinlan to make it happen. Rather than face justice, McCoy shoots himself dead. He had a plan to set up Holt for Quinlan's murder, but must have decided it was hopeless.

The Whit Masterson novel forges an opposition between the intuition of McCoy and Quinlan versus the evidence sought by Holt. Without question Holt is the story's noir protagonist, however devoid of human flaws that so often define such characters in traditional film noirs. Never is there a moment when he considers doing the right thing and then elects to do the wrong thing ("the break" as coined by film noir expert Eddie Muller). Holt is an honorable man who only wants to perform his job properly and be a good father and husband. The chaotic world around him refuses to cooperate. At the outset he sees himself as emotionally detached from the verdict—not a crusader—happy just to know he did his best. That trait changes as the story unspools.

Holt claims neutrality while doing detective work ("I'm in nobody's corner.") and possesses a strong conscience; he would never ask a jury to return a verdict contrary to his own beliefs. He is accused of using the Linneker case for political utility when he holds no such aspirations. When underworld personality Dan Buccio offers to aid Holt in his investigation work, Holt flatly refuses the offer. Holt has too much character to accept assistance of any kind from the likes of Buccio. Holt also rejects help from his brother-in-law Oscar, who seems too eager for a gunfight. In a theme that would find expansion in the movie adaptation, Holt defends his Mexican wife while acknowledging America's ingrained racism.

One of the novel's predominant themes involves the underlying presumption that men wish to be perceived as better than they really are. Roughly halfway through the novel that point is made clear when Holt learns his wife's father has not killed all of the trophies he proudly displays; some of them were purchased to convey the impression of a superior hunter. "He's a good hunter but he'd like everybody to believe he's even better than he is," notes his daughter Connie. Holt wonders if such behavior is driven by external pressures, as in the case of McCoy and Quinlan, who perhaps "...found themselves in a position where they had to produce—or else."

Another key theme to the novel concerns the preservation of entrenched systems. District Attorney James Adair worries the story of McCoy and Quinlan framing people over a long period of time, a truthful account or not, would be devastating to law enforcement credibility. For his efforts in pursuit of justice, Holt is nearly killed, his wife is jailed on trumped-up drug charges, his daughter Nancy is sent across the US border for her own protection. The more the ethical man Holt endeavors to do the right thing, the more those who represent the establishment push back at him. The police, the press and even his own boss make Holt's pursuit of justice far more difficult than it should be. To lobby against deeply-rooted institutions in which everyone looks out for each other amounts to an incredible challenge that surely would discourage the average person.

To the present-day reader, the novel surveys numerous social issues that remain stubbornly relevant, for instance gun control. Similarly, BADGE OF EVIL reveals bias in the mainstream media is not an issue unique to modern society, though many people probably assume that. When Holt realizes his best option for assistance with his investigation of McCoy and Quinlan is to go to the press, only one of three newspapers is a realistic option. And though the novel does nothing to encourage the idea, the fact that Ernest Farnum hangs himself in his jail cell seems suspicious. Did McCoy get Farnum out of the picture? That possibility is in no way at odds with the narrative material that surrounds it.

THE FILM:

The Welles adaptation simplifies the plot mechanics of the novel's detective work and minimizes the characters involved while adding a stable of new supporting players (many had collaborated with Welles previously). The setting is transported from California to the Texas–Mexico border, while an interrupted honeymoon substitutes for a perpetually delayed vacation. The novel's Consuela ("Connie") Mayatorena Holt is a "full-blooded Mexican" woman, her husband is Assistant DA Mitchell Holt, a Californian. The film's equivalent couple is represented by Mexican man Ramon Miguel "Mike" Vargas (Charlton Heston), Chairman of the Pan-American Narcotics Commission, and his amicable wife Susan (the lily-white Janet Leigh), an American citizen. Welles builds the book's narcotics component into a major plot thread, with Susan framed to look like a junkie to discredit her ambitious husband. What's more, in the film a man's wife is not just positioned to look like a drug addict, the crooked cop sets her up for a murder rap. An implication from the novel that did not make it to the film is Rudy Linneker, a widower, was in some sort of unhealthy relationship with his daughter. Taken from the first chapter:


"The snack bar was set with a light dinner for two because he had dared his daughter to join him in a mid-winter swim that night and she generally did as he suggested. So he loafed and thought what a comfort a girl was to a man in his prime. Occasionally he cocked his head like an elderly lovebird and listened for the sound of his daughter's step descending the wooden stairs on the bluff behind his private floodlighted beach."

Perhaps the above was a bit much to translate into what was supposed to be a commercial, mainstream movie.

The film opens in Los Robles, a fictional Mexican border town. A deadly explosion occurs immediately after the honeymooners Vargas and Susan cross the border and kiss! The thematically-timed car bomb claims the lives of construction magnate Rudy Linnekar (Jeffrey Green) and his stripper girlfriend Zita (Joi Lansing). The fact that the explosive device was planted on the Mexican side of the border complicates matters for law enforcement agents on both sides. "All border towns bring out the worst in a country," Vargas explains to his wife. That kiss, a celebration of love between a "mixed" couple, sets the tone for a film concerned with racial tensions.

As with Welles's CITIZEN KANE, often noted as the greatest cinematic achievement ever, TOUCH OF EVIL depicts the fall of a respected man due to his own ego. Police Captain Hank Quinlan (Welles), an amalgamation of the novel's McCoy and Quinlan, is guided by his intuition when it comes to making arrests. Quinlan does not respect Vargas; that much is obvious shortly after they meet. Quinlan walks with a cane for assistance, like the Quinlan of the novel and any number of hobbled individuals who populate film noirs such as ABANDONED (1949), GILDA (1946), THE LADY FROM SHANGHAI (1947) and STRANGERS IN THE NIGHT (1944). Broken bodies in film noir tend to reflect fragile or fractured minds. Welles's Quinlan might be the ultimate seedy American villain, the racist, sweaty southern cop epitomized. He is an obese, unshaven cigar-smoker with a predisposition for coffee, donuts and sweet rolls. The picture of perfect health. Unflattering low camera angles emphasize Quinlan's considerable bulk. He shows disdain for miscegenation when he wonders out loud why Susan, married to Vargas, is obviously not a Mexican woman. A vanity project this surely was not.

During a tense interrogation sequence, we are able to get to know Quinlan even better. Murder suspect Manelo Sanchez (Victor Millan), a shoe salesman, lives in an apartment provided by his lover, Marcia Linnekar (Joanna Moore), whose father was blown to smithereens. Sanchez is concerned Quinlan will rough him up as part of the veteran cop's reputed interrogation tactics. Sure enough, Quinlan contemptuously slaps Sanchez for his repeated attempts to speak in his native language. After Vargas comes to Sanchez's defense, Quinlan condescendingly questions whether Vargas might require assistance with an American telephone. The openly racist Quinlan believes Sanchez murdered Rudy Linnekar because Linnekar wasn't too keen on the prospect of a Mexican son-in-law (Quinlan assumes the elder Linnekar must have shared his values). Congruent with the novel, a corrupt cop attempts to railroad the man he believes is guilty of murder while a younger, far more scrupulous man encounters heavy resistance when he suggests evidence was planted (in the film, Vargas knows from his own eyesight evidence somehow materialized that had not existed previously). When Vargas merely recounts his clear observation, Quinlan accuses him of siding with his countryman. In another theme lifted from the novel, somebody's reputation has to be destroyed, either that of Vargas or Quinlan.

Quinlan's sorrow over his wife's death at first would seem to be a screenwriting attempt to prevent him from being totally unsympathetic, but in fact the opposite meaning is achieved when Quinlan describes his wife's strangulation in a disturbing manner. He tells listening ear Police Sergeant Pete Menzies (Joseph Calleia), "Strangling is the smart way to kill—clean, silent...you don't leave fingerprints on a piece of string...That half-breed done it, of course...That was the last killer that ever got out of my hands." Should Quinlan be considered a reliable narrator? Based on the dynamite that suddenly appears in a shoebox, what motivation does the viewer have to believe what Quinlan says about anything? And why would he go into such sordid detail about the murder of his wife? Most likely his wife was having an affair with a "half-breed" and that discovery pushed Quinlan over the edge. The sequence thus serves several functions:  we learn Quinlan has been framing suspects for years, his potential to kill is made evident and his dislike for the relationship between Vargas and Susan is given some background. Through research of public records, Vargas discovers the Linnekar case is just the latest occasion Quinlan has gone the extra mile to make sure someone who he sees as guilty does not escape conviction.

The best element of Quinlan's life is his friendship with Tana (Marlene Dietrich), a fortune teller. At some point after (or before, who knows?) the death of his wife, Quinlan would shack up with Tana for days at a time with a case of whiskey. His professional reputation about to blow up in his face, Quinlan returns to Tana, as well as the bottle after a dozen years on the wagon. Or has he been drinking all along? Perhaps Quinlan's stubborn world view reflects his disappointment with his lifetime achievements. After 30 years on the force, what does he have to show for it? Not nearly enough if you ask him. Despite his curmudgeonly, non-progressive attitudes, Quinlan nonetheless emanates a strong sense of entitlement.

Like many film noir detectives Quinlan has his own moral code, but his is attached to an ignoble history of framing those he deemed guilty based on sheer gut-level instinct. "I'm just going on my intuition," Quinlan remarks. Admittedly his impressions are often correct. He prophetically tells his best friend Pete, "Pretty soon you'll be flapping your wings like an angel." And ultimately Quinlan's feeling about Sanchez provides some vindication for the fallen cop. He says he framed "nobody that wasn't guilty." For all we know, he might be right about that. Certainly Quinlan's final hunch is right on the money:  Vargas is tailing him and Pete is wired. Ever the opportunist, Quinlan hopes to frame Vargas after his gun is used to stop Pete, but Pete survives to eliminate Quinlan, the man he always had admired. So, is Quinlan beyond redemption? Not according to Welles, who allows Tana to comment pensively on Quinlan's death:  "He was some kind of a man. What does it matter what you say about people?" But even before that succinct summation, Welles makes a point of repeatedly capturing a "JESUS SAVES" neon sign that shines on the same road as the Ritz Hotel, where Quinlan kills "Uncle" Joe Grandi (Akim Tamiroff) and sets the table for his own demise with a forgotten item.

The harassment of Susan loomed large in Universal's marketing campaign for TOUCH OF EVIL. Provocation begins early when she is led to the Ritz Hotel, where strobing lights in the area suggest uncertainty. Initially not all that intimidated, Susan derisively names one of the young Grandi crime family members "Pancho" (Valentin de Vargas) and shows little concern for him or his uncle. Later she chucks a light bulb at a pesky flashlight-wielding stalker. In spite of her recent marriage to a Mexican man, Susan's prejudices emerge again when she tells her husband she would feel safer at an American motel. Obviously that assumption does not play out; Susan finds herself in no position to take on the role of feisty heroine during the siege sequence at the Mirador Motel. Instead she plays the part of damsel in distress during a slow-burn assault that assembles all of white America's fears about foreigners (Donald Trump's “bad hombres”) and the LGBTQ community, which are presented as one and the same. It is implied Susan was gang-raped ("Hold her legs."). Did Vargas provoke the attack after targeting Grandi's brother in Mexico City, or did Susan encourage the attack with her dismissive attitude about Mexicans? Whatever the reason, Welles forces us to consider an ugly implication, despite a character's statement made after the fact that Susan was not touched in that way. I don't buy it; I think that line of dialog was inserted to cover up the horrible sexual crime that obviously transpired. In so many ways this is a film about people believing what they want to believe, and that extends to the viewer as well. Welles arranges for several plot threads that are open to interpretation. The Mirador sequence is the most disconcerting of the bunch, the "touch of evil" alluded to by the film's title treatment. Welles proves he was not above exploiting xenophobic fears, but to halt the analysis there would be to miss the more disturbing point:  the Grandi gang that menaces Susan does so in coordination with a celebrated American lawman. It is precisely the sort of partnership citizens should fear most. Welles stages the partnership cleverly; as Quinlan forms an alliance at a bar with Grandi, who has criminal ties on both sides of the border, Quinlan sits with his back to the bar's jukebox in indifference to the music linked to the Grandi youths that will terrorize Susan.

"Your future is all used up."

—Tana

When Quinlan stands before a strung-out Susan at the Ritz, a flashing light accents his present state of mind as he follows through on his latest frame job. As Quinlan strangles the Mexican clan's ringleader Grandi, the scene is filmed to suggest a rape-like assault, probably in harmony with what occurred behind a closed door at the Mirador and most assuredly a bitter man's re-enactment of what happened to his departed wife. For someone with such a notable history for framing people, it is ironic Quinlan subconsciously frames himself by leaving his cane in the hotel room where he strangled a man to death (Welles gives us a close up of the "Forget Anything?" sign on the hotel room's door to tip us off as to Quinlan's destiny). How fitting, and fatalistic, the same methods that earned Quinlan his lauded reputation as a detective precipitate his downfall.

Quinlan believes Mike Vargas and "idealists" like him are what is wrong with the world. Vargas is positioned as the incorruptible, opposite pole of the eminently corrupt Quinlan. With a Mexican character serving as the film's moral compass, the differences between Vargas and Quinlan ignite racial tensions. It is commented, "This Mexican is bringing criminal charges against one of the most respected police officers in the country," as if Vargas's nationality cancels any credence to his story. In a theme echoed throughout motion picture history, Vargas is compelled to become tougher and tougher as formidable forces oppose his ideals. After his wife is assaulted and framed for murder, Vargas aggressively goes after the Grandi hoodlums. After Grandi's nephew Pancho blows smoke in Vargas's face (a move that has its parallel when Quinlan plays the upper hand in his interrogation of Sanchez), an enraged Vargas rams the head of Pancho through the bar room jukebox ("I'm a husband now, not a cop."). From there he continues to employ the same sort of tactics favored by Quinlan in an effort to incriminate the master of set-ups. The transformation of Vargas, who must modify his approach in order to entrap Quinlan, speaks to masculine provinces posited as universal under certain circumstances. Vargas must wade through a literal cesspool to bring about Quinlan's downfall. As Vargas tells Quinlan:  "A policeman's job is only easy in a police state."

The Mexican border provides appropriate terrain for rugged noir stories, as explored in OUT OF THE PAST (1947), RIDE THE PINK HORSE (1947), THE BIG STEAL (1949), BORDER INCIDENT (1949) and THE HITCH-HIKER (1953), to name just several. In TOUCH OF EVIL, the windy Los Robles area is put forward as a corrupt, tawdry community where neon lights, sleazy hotels and strip clubs merge to form a suitable backdrop for corruption and decadence. Streets are mostly deserted, save for the occasional shadow of someone following somebody. The location footage accumulated by Welles and his director of photography Russell Metty in Venice, Los Angeles is almost otherworldly in atmosphere, the high-contrast B & W cinematography always complimented by meaningful blocking that comments on the characters. The virtuoso camerawork, lighting and editing come together with slick precision, save for the occasional conventional sequence inserted by the studio. The scenes for which Welles was not present really jump out at you; his camera never stands still for long, so static shots are always suspect. Welles even demonstrates there is a time and place for shakycam, an overused trope of modern filmmaking I have grown to despise. That famously uninterrupted opening segment, sustained for 3m 28s before we see a cut, is well summarized by Dale Thomajan in his book FROM CYD CHARISSE TO PSYCHO:  BOOK OF MOVIE BESTS (1992, p.142):


"Words are incapable of adequately describing the sophistication of this historic exercise in spatial architecture or fully capturing its excitement; it's the kind of thing that makes youngsters want to become filmmakers and makes established filmmakers want to retire in envy and frustration."

One of Welles's cinematic compulsions this time out is trash blowing around everywhere, symbolic of the dirty tactics embodied by his Quinlan. At times the area’s waste seems to envelop him (think Pig-Pen from Charles M. Schulz's PEANUTS comic strip). Los Robles is a dirty, rowdy environment that matches Quinlan so well, one gets the feeling the town developed into what it is as Quinlan aged into what he is. It is no place for the squeamish; the impact of the opening sequence's explosion prompts one of the film's more morbid quotes, "I guess that's my father." The brutal damage done to Linnekar's stripper escort Zita is referenced later when a gang member tosses acid in the direction of Vargas, who is able to avoid the substance as it disfigures a poster of Zita (a "sizzling stripper" as she and her coworkers are marketed). Also Quinlan comments on a shoe that was discovered with a foot in it following the explosion, the probable inspiration for planting incriminating dynamite sticks in a shoebox. The two ideas parallel perfectly when Quinlan conveys a strange fascination with the post-explosion body part among the litter that clutters Los Robles.

TOUCH OF EVIL concludes as the racist cop's time expires (a nice idea, but almost 65 years later the stuff of fantasy, not reality). Nonetheless the film remains a cynical viewing experience, probably more grounded in the real world than the Whit Masterson source novel. With no equivalent to the book's Ernest Farnum confession (Farnum is converted into a peripheral character), the film wraps up on a decidedly more pessimistic note, regardless of the viewer's interpretation:  either Quinlan's intuition was 100% accurate, or Sanchez confessed after being tortured by cops (at one point Quinlan gives instruction over the phone to "break" Sanchez). Neither explanation could be considered a positive takeaway. If Quinlan was correct about Sanchez, he might have been right about everyone he helped convict in the past. To consider TOUCH OF EVIL in film noir terms, I prefer that reading and the rich noir irony associated with the disgraced, dying cop floating in filth, forever unaware his suspicion about Sanchez was on the money. Let's face it:  Sanchez probably was mostly after Marcia's money and was willing to kill her father to get his hands on it, and Linnekar probably wasn't ecstatic about his daughter's choice for a significant other.

The production boasts a tremendous supporting cast, mostly thanks to the presence of Welles as writer/director. A notable character unique to the film is Marlene Dietrich's Tana, the noir antithesis to the Susan character. Other peripheral players that create an impression include Zsa Zsa Gabor, Joseph Cotten, Ray Collins, Mercedes McCambridge (as a butch gang member) and especially Dennis Weaver as the quirky Mirador Motel night manager, no doubt an influence on the Norman Bates character played by Anthony Perkins in director Alfred Hitchcock’s noir horror classic PSYCHO (1960). Of course Janet Leigh's Susan is impossible to watch without thinking about Marion Crane's fate in the Hitchcock film. Leigh is best remembered for portraying two of the American cinema's most memorable women in peril. Similarities between TOUCH OF EVIL and PSYCHO are interesting enough:

  • Like the isolated Bates Motel, "the Mirador is hard to find, with the new highway branching off the way it does."
  • Pancho tells Susan, "You're the only guest we've got here."
  • Susan's name is not found in the register book.
  • Low camera angles imprison Susan in her motel room.

Kino Lorber’s recent 4K Ultra HD release of TOUCH OF EVIL is a must-own addition to their impressive Studio Classics product line. The collection includes three separate triple-layer UHD100 discs, each dedicated to one of three versions of the feature film, all granted crisp new 4K transfers. To my eye, the new Dolby Vision HDR Master of the theatrical cut looks the best of the three versions. The rendition of TOUCH OF EVIL perhaps most familiar to the public gets a fresh audio commentary treatment from film historian Tim Lucas, my erstwhile editor when I was a contributor for his VIDEO WATCHDOG magazine. A veteran of over 150 commentaries, Lucas seems well aware of every possible connection between TOUCH OF EVIL and other film productions. He offers extensive information on all of the relevant players in front of and behind the camera, and also references the similarities and differences between film and novel. For Welles, the adaptation was an opportunity to demonstrate he could complete a commercially-viable film on time and within budget. Unfortunately, the film went over budget and was not a profit center for Universal Pictures. Lucas notes the bravura opening scene, uninterrupted by cuts, is briefer than the one-shot crime investigation sessions at Sanchez's apartment, which run 6m 21s and 5m 27s respectively. That first (longer) shot involving the grilling of Sanchez was born out of a filmmaker's wish for control more than a desire to make an artistic statement; the no-editing approach put the film one day ahead of schedule and kept studio meddling at bay, for a while anyway. An excellent observation from Lucas involves the multiple canes present when Vargas uses a blind shopkeeper's telephone, something I never had noticed. But what best separates Lucas from other film historian voices is his consideration of the film that might have been. As he often does, here he offers specific examples where the theatrical release could have benefitted in terms of continuity and narrative clarity. But despite the studio interference that "mangled" the finished product, Welles maintained this version came the closest to matching his original vision. The disc also includes a murky theatrical trailer (2m 11s) as well as the 2008 audio commentary from writer/filmmaker F.X. Feeney.

For the next disc, film historian Imogen Sara Smith was tapped on the shoulder to record a new audio commentary track for the reconstructed version of TOUCH OF EVIL that first surfaced in 1998. 48 changes were implemented into this rendition of the film with the intent of restoring the original Welles vision. The most apparent revision comes early, with the removal of the credits and Henry Mancini's theme music from the opening shot. The movie's wild border-town tone is better established with strictly diegetic music, transitioning from Latin jazz to rock and roll. That update integrates well with the film's other diegetic music and what it signifies. Rock and roll is associated with the leather-clad Mexican hoodlums on the American side of the border; a conservative's nightmare I suppose, the two ideas combined. Similarly, up-tempo rock music blasted within the Mirador is connected with narcotics. Nobody working in film analysis today breaks down a scene more carefully and convincingly than Smith, who I always can count on to identify things I am ashamed I never noticed about a film I've seen repeatedly. For instance, when Susan unexpectedly is photographed with Pancho, the concept of her being framed is introduced. This motif recurs throughout the narrative. Another valuable insight from Smith is the desert as crucial film noir setting, the inverse of the crowded urban milieu. Though ostensibly polar opposites, each setting offers its own unique blend of alienation and precarious situations. In the case of TOUCH OF EVIL, the Mexican side of the border is embodied by the city, the American side is represented by the desert. In the context of film language, an essential skill Welles commanded was his ability to create juxtapositions ("rhyming shots") that emphasize something unknown to one of the characters. "Evil Lost and Found" (17m 5s) chronicles the piecing together of the reconstructed cut based upon the long memo Welles authored in reaction to the preview cut. Another audio option is the 2008 commentary track with Charlton Heston, Janet Leigh and Reconstruction Producer Rick Schmidlin.

The third disc contains the preview cut that runs about 14 minutes longer than the theatrical cut. The legacy audio commentary track (first issued in 2008) features Orson Welles historians Jonathan Rosenbaum and James Naremore, who note the preview cut was discovered in the mid-1970s. It includes additional footage shot by Welles along with studio-imposed footage intended to make the film easier to follow. Rosenbaum and Naremore indicate TOUCH OF EVIL might be the least tampered with of any of Welles's American productions; a stunning assertion when one reflects upon it. Technically speaking the preview cut plays darker and with heavier grain than the theatrical cut, particularly during the film's many nocturnal sequences. Tagged by the commentators are the Harry Keller-directed reshoots, all of which were completed in one day in the studio's attempt to clarify the supposedly serpentine plot. All of the new scenes were injected after Welles went MIA before the final cut was delivered. The featurette "Bringing Evil to Life" (2008, 20m 59s) reviews the feature film's production history.

For those classic film fans who have not committed to a 4K Blu-ray player, this 3-disc set is as good an excuse as any to take that step.




Commemorative mural by artist Jonas Never [23 Windward Ave, Venice, CA, 90291]